![]() Each has decided that the evidence displayed is, indeed, realistic, and exactly as one would expect for the victim of a crucifixion.įorensic experts have theorized about the exact cause of death. Several forensic experts have examined the Shroud. It must have been excruciatingly painful to undergo the experience suggested by the wounds on the Shroud. The wounds indicate a traumatic experience for the individual. The water stains on the centerline were presumably left from the water used to put out the fire, while the edge water stains may have occurred as a result of the method of storage in a large container. There are a number of triangular patches sown into the Shroud that were meant to repair damage done during a fire that occurred in 1532. We know of only one case where a cap of thorns is described, specifically in the Gospels about the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. There is an additional feature that is not known to be a part of a crucifixion-the cap (or “crown”) of thorns. It would certainly have fit into a description of what we know of as a Roman crucifixion. There is a blood stain on the side of the victim that indicates a puncture wound of some sort. The dorsal image shows what look like dumbbell-shaped images that are indicative of a whipping. There are numerous blood stains on the cloth: on the wrists, feet, and head. The image is of a man who was severely beaten and tortured. ![]() ![]() (Front of the body to the left, dorsal side of the body to the right.) Figure 2: Shroud as it appears to the unaided eye. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |